[pkg-fso-maint] Uncoordinated libfsotransport transition

Cyril Brulebois kibi at debian.org
Thu May 24 07:55:31 UTC 2012


Hello,

and thanks for the quick answer.

Sebastian Reichel <sre at debian.org> (24/05/2012):
> binNMU should work without FTBFS, but as I said we will update the
> packages this week, so I guess binNMU is not needed.

OK.

> pkg-fso is the Maintainer of all reverse dependencies, so I assumed
> that coordination with the release team is not strictly needed. I
> will send a message next time.

That could look like it, but your packages might get entangled in some
other transition, making it painful for everyone. Also, we usually
coordinate with ftpmasters the removal of old binaries, so that the
packages can migrate as soon as they are ready (otherwise, out of date
binaries postpone this migration).

Mraw,
KiBi.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20120524/107981a3/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-fso-maint mailing list