[pkg-horde] New pkg-horde member
reg at evolix.fr
Sun Jun 8 01:04:23 UTC 2008
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:19:20AM +0200, Mathieu PARENT wrote:
> > - Why do you add a check for external libs in orig.tar.gz? They
> > *are* in orig.tar.gz as long we use upstream tarballs. External
> > libs are not non-DFSG then I think we should continue to use
> > the pristine source tarball. And why is your check test named
> > "check-dfsg"? Do you think some libs are non-DFSG? If yes, they
> > must no be uploaded in main!
> Oh, yes: check-dfsg is probably not the right term, these tools ARE
> dfsg! "check-external" ?
> The idea is to share code. As tinymce2, fckeditor, scriptaculous,
> prototypeJS are packaged in debian (and xinha is coming ...), this
> reduce code duplication. This is requested by the security team.
I'm not sure it's requested by the security team if the code is
only in source package. But it's a good idea when we save disk
space. And here we gain 1 Mo. Then I commit changes to repack
upstream sources (see cleanup.sh script).
> > - Could you explain your changelog entry
> > "lib/Horde/Kolab/IMAP/pear.php: corrected ::getUids() and
> > ::getAnnotation()"? Is it a Debian-specific patch?
> This is a Kolab+debian specific patch, as discussed in
> https://www.intevation.de/roundup/kolab/issue2725. Without this,
> freebusy doesn't work for kolab. This patch doesn't affect non-kolab
Could you show me the patch? And could you ask upstream to use it?
> > - Is xinha package ready for unstable? Do you think it will be
> > uploaded soon?
> IMHO, yes. What I need is an uploader.
> I'm waiting for:
> - either mentors
> - either webapps team
> : 20080531
help you for xinha package. I intent to prepare horde3 package
with xinha included and remove xinha when your package will be
Gregory Colpart <reg at evolix.fr> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E
Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/
More information about the pkg-horde-hackers