[pkg-horde] Feedback about recent horde packaging

Mathieu Parent math.parent at gmail.com
Tue Jan 5 13:30:37 UTC 2010


Some more news.

I have done some bug triaging, but I'm tired now. Main remaining parts
are horde3, chora2 and gollem.

Regards

Mathieu Parent



On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Mathieu Parent <math.parent at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As you have probably noticed, I have uploaded new versions of horde
> apps (namely ansel1, dimp1, horde3, imp4, ingo1, kronolith2, mnemo2,
> nag2, sork-passwd-h3, turba2). This was with some pain but now should
> be ok (See below).
>
> Remaining apps:
> - gollem, sork-forwards-h3, sork-vacation-h3 (Note that those two will
> be merged in ingo for Horde4). I probably won't work on those now.
> - some apps have not yet been packaged (see
> http://www.horde.org/projects.php and
> http://wiki.horde.org/ReleaseManagement including dimp, trean, whups,
> hermes, klutz). We should focus on improving apps that are already in
> the archive, but any contribution is welcome.
> - horde-sam should probably removed as Spam filter rule is in Ingo 1.2
> (what do you think?)
> - chora2 is already up to date.
>
> I had some problems using git, and need some light ;)
>
> First, when reverting a patch in the upstream+patches branch, it still
> appears when running debian/rules refresh-patches.
>
> Example with turba:
>
> #./debian/rules refresh-patches
> refreshing debian/patches:
> 0001-When-using-Kolab-other-sources-are-removed.patch
> 0002-Import-new-upstream-sources.patch
> 0003-Revert-When-using-Kolab-other-sources-are-removed.patch
> .
> #git diff --summary upstream..upstream+patches
> (empty)
>
> How to clean this? (And why Import-new-upstream-sources is here?)
>
> Second, how to revert dimp1 to a "no upstream+repack branch"?
>
> Last but not least: Greg, thanks for your doc
> http://wiki.debian.org/Horde/GitUsage
>
> Mathieu Parent
>



More information about the pkg-horde-hackers mailing list