[Pkg-ime-devel] Re: AMD64 patch etc.

[Osamu Aoki]

On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 03:52:45PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi Ming,
> 
> Hi Osamu,
> 
> > I will let the current package go into the testing (2 more days)
> 
> scim packages 1.0.1-4 are in testing now, so are the scim-uim 0.1.3-2
> package (which fixes the nasty FTBFS bug).  It seems we are in a good
> shape.  :-)
> 
> > While waiting, can you prepare new package with amd64 patch and new
> > upstream and package consolidation ?
> 
> I've made 1.0.2-1 package for scim, they are in SVN now.  I've tested it
> a bit and it is working fine for me.  If some one is interested in
> testing this new 1.0.2 packages, but don't want to build him/herself
> (scim takes a lot of time to build indeed), I can provide a apt-getable
> repository.  Just ask.  :-)

Since I wanted to check uscan, I tried it.  No it does not work.
I think fancy sourceforge redirect only works in web browser.

If you can think somethiong to avoid this, please fix watch file.  I
will ignore this bug for now.

(Besides, current pattern will grub 1.1.1 instead)

> A reminder to those who check out from SVN:  svn.debian.org was moved to
> a new machine at the beginning of this year.  Please use svn.debian.org
> as your repository (don't use svn.alioth.debian.org or anything
> similar).  Your account and password should be the same, but you
> probably need to change the SSH key for the new machine.  See
> debian-devel-announce mailing list for details.  If you need to change
> the name of your repository (you won't if you keep using
> svn.debian.org), the command ``svn relocate'' will help a lot.
> 
> > I will likely to check it after 10th.  Until then, I am busy.

I am building it now here.

> I managed to reproduce a segfault with mozilla-firefox for scim 1.0.1 in
> some special condition.  I'll investigate it a little more and follow up
> the two segfault bug reports.  I know there are some memory-leak fix in
> 1.0.2, and some other changes to fix hanging-up.  I'll see if it manages
> to solve my segfault problem.  And if yes, I'll ask the reporters of
> those bugs to try the new package.
> 
> > Please also check what is the difference between 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 (New
> > upstream)?  Then check which patch was included.  When packaging, please
> > document patch set changes.
> 
> The change from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 are quite large.  Two of our patches are
> included (cout-to-cerr, and the gnumeric data loss fix).  I also added
> the amd64/gcc-4.0 FTBFS fix.  All changes are documented in
> debian/changelog as well as the SVN commit log.

Good.  I will check it more and upload soon.

I think panel sometimes does not get erased.

By the way, are you planning to do scim-qtimm packaging?

Osamu