[Pkg-ime-devel] RFS: ibus-typing-booster -- [second try]

[Vasudev Kamath]

Osamu Aoki <osamu_aoki_home at nifty.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I think you may misunderstood us.
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 08:23:40PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> Osamu Aoki <osamu_aoki_home at nifty.com> writes:
> ...
>> > Did you updated it not to use CDBS as we asked initially?
>> 
>> No sorry, I think I had asked this before joining the team if its okay
>> to use CDBS and after getting okay from Aaron I requested to join.
>
> Please read old mails.  Both Aron and me were very clear we wish to have
> dh.  If you have a well connected other supporter sponsoring your
> package, "it is OK to use".  We do not reject CDBS.  That is what was
> all discussed.

OK I do have sponsor for my CDBS package only that I didn't  drag him in
because as you said I misunderstood things.

>
>> > We do take care many packages and I can not help unless you make our
>> > life easier.
>> 
>> I understand, but I don't want to switch so let the package wait for
>> some more time :). 
>
>     (As much as you do not want to switch, I do not.)
>
> You need to secure a good responsive sponsor to keep your package in
> good shape for next release.  So far, it was too slow for you to get
> such a person.  I say it is time for you to rethink.

Oh no I do have sponsor but I thought if some one from the team could
sponsor it would be great but anyway the sponsor I have is bit busy
these days (and yes its Jonas who actually is also developer of CDBS).

>
> If you use CDBS just because you only know CDBS, that should never be
> the reason for using it.  Please explin why you insist.

Its not that I only know CDBS, I started from dh but then learnt CDBS
and I like it now that is the whole reason I changed to CDBS because I'm
comfortable with it.


>
> PS: I do (and did) have CDBS packages though I converted most of them into dh.
>     maybe ... it is time to think make dh as requirement now ...

I can convert the package it to dh not a problem, just for the sake of
the package but let me see, converting means redoing all things I've
done already and I'm really not having enough free time to do it because
of other backlogs. But if I get some free time I will consider it.

Thanks,
-- 
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ime-devel/attachments/20140118/cab1e0ac/attachment.sig>