[Pkg-jed-commit] r689 - in jed/branches/0.99.19/debian: . patches

[Jörg Sommer]

Hallo Rafael,

Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Wed 16. May, 01:30 (+0200):
> * Jörg Sommer <joerg at alea.gnuu.de> [2007-05-16 00:24]:
> > Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Tue 15. May, 18:10 (+0200):
> > > This is my fault, sorry, I should not have started using the .svn.<rev>
> > > versioning scheme.  Anyway, I am afraid we will have to revert this change,
> > > unless we start using an epoch (i.e. 1:0.99.19~pre78-1).  Tell me what you
> > > prefer.
> > 
> > If we can upload a lower version to unstable than I would prefer to leave
> > this broken version in experimental and wait for the 0.99.19 tarball.
> 
> The installer accepts happily uploads to unstable with version numbers
> lesser than that in experimental (this happens all the time, BTW).  So we
> can continue with the ".svn.*" scheme I started with or simply use
> 0.99.19.78 for the next upload.

But 0.99.19.78 is not greater than 0.99.19.svn.60. Is 0.99.19.+pre78 a
valid version? I really prefer to use the version of jed instead of the
svn revision.

> Once the 0.99-19 tarball is released, we upload 0.99.19-1 to unstable.
> As I wrote above, the package in experimental will not be removed.
> However, this will not be problematic, since we will probably use
> experimental for the 0.99.20.* series, or whatever is greater than
> 0.99.19.*.

I think, this is OK. We should do it.

Schöne Grüße, Jörg.
-- 
Damit das Mögliche entsteht, muß immer wieder das Unmögliche versucht
werden.                                       (Hermann Hesse)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-jed-devel/attachments/20070516/25883441/attachment.pgp