jed: loosen build-depend on libslang2-dev >= 2.0.7
Jörg Sommer
joerg at alea.gnuu.de
Fri May 25 10:24:12 UTC 2007
Hi Rafael,
Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Thu 24. May, 18:13 (+0200):
> * Jörg Sommer <joerg at alea.gnuu.de> [2007-05-24 12:55]:
>
> > I suggest to reassign the bug to slang and merge it with the bug report
> > there.
>
> This is probably the best think to do.
>
> At any rate, I just noticed that you have closed Bug#425424. We can only
> merge it with #425417 if we either reopen #425424 or if we also close
> #425417.
Doesn't forcemerge not help?
> > IMO it's wrong to add a dependency to work around???nothing else are
> > you doing with adding the dependency???a bug in a broken library. I
> > wouldn't file a bug report against all or random packages, if I find a
> > bug in fread()???that's stupid.
>
> My understanding of it is that Günter wished to get the problem documented
> somewhere, such that users can be informed about the problem.
I don't know why we should document bugs in libslang.
As you might have seen in the discussion on debian-mentors the
reassignment of the bug to libslang2 is the recommended proceeding.
Bye, Jörg.
--
chinesiches Sprichwort:
Wer fragt, ist ein Narr für fünf Minuten.
Wer nicht fragt, ist ein Narr fürs ganze Leben.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-jed-devel/attachments/20070525/583f30b6/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-jed-devel
mailing list