[Pkg-jed-commit] [SCM] Debian packaging of JED branch, upstream-fixes, updated. 231492d81036768d4b77c9dc2e657234f4ec5acf

Jörg Sommer joerg at alea.gnuu.de
Mon Nov 23 21:37:31 UTC 2009


G. Milde hat am Sun 22. Nov, 20:53 (+0100) geschrieben:
> On 22.11.09, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Dear Jörg and all other pdg-jed-develers,
> >     Update to rcs.sl 1.0.1 from Guido Gonzato
> >     The file http://guido.gonzato.googlepages.com/rcs.sl contains some
> >     changes that might be worth merging upstream.
> I wonder whether we shouldn't have a consistent policy regarding to
> user-contributed drop-ins or upgrades.
> In my view, jed-common should ship with the upstream versions of SLang
> files (modes) and updates or replacements ship in either jed-extra or
> another optional extension.

Yes. But here's something different. I maintain a branch with patches I
would like to see applied upstream. One time to not forget about them and
the other time to provide up to date patches to John. Before a new
request to John I rebase the branch on the current upstream source
branch. None of the commits in upstream-fixes is in the code used for


I only put the patches with the updated modes in the upstream-fixes
branch to get patches I can send to John.

Regards, Jörg.
- StGB § 328 Absatz 2, Nr. 3: Mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu
fünf Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe wird bestraft, wer eine
nukleare Explosion verursacht.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-jed-devel/attachments/20091123/bc24e0b2/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Pkg-jed-devel mailing list