WARNING: updated udev package!

[martin f krafft]

also sprach martin f krafft <madduck at debian.org> [2009.03.19.0922 +0100]:
> I wasn't aware of any upstream rules for mdadm. I now see
> 64-md-raid.rules. Why doesn't the udev package install them? md
> devices can exist and be used without mdadm installed after all.

Sorry, that was a brisk. What I meant of course was: is there any
reason why we shouldn't coordinate a switch from the mdadm rules
I snatched from Suse and which are probably unmaintained by now to
the ones tracked in the udev upstream?

If yes, then given that md devices could be used without mdadm
installed, wouldn't it make sense to have that file in the udev
package?

Thanks for the heads-up, and sorry for being a bit short-spoken
earlier today.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"crying is the refuge of plain women but the ruin of pretty ones."
                                                        -- oscar wilde
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lvm-maintainers/attachments/20090319/b7705d29/attachment.pgp