WARNING: updated udev package!

[Marco d'Itri]

On Mar 19, martin f krafft <madduck at debian.org> wrote:

> If yes, then given that md devices could be used without mdadm
> installed, wouldn't it make sense to have that file in the udev
> package?
No because they call mdadm. This is commented in the upstream rules but
Fedora and Ubuntu do it. I think you should look at the Ubuntu package.
While it's /possible/ to use md without mdadm I think it's a corner case
not very relevant.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lvm-maintainers/attachments/20090319/08370e94/attachment.pgp