Michael Tokarev: fixed a typo (RAID6 vs RAID10) in FAQ (Closes: #637068)

[Michael Tokarev]

Module: mdadm
Branch: build
Commit: 63bde5754fb7b1cca1c98bb64835dd3e6e347495
URL:    http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=commit;h=63bde5754fb7b1cca1c98bb64835dd3e6e347495

Author: Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru>
Date:   Tue Jan 10 18:39:17 2012 +0400

fixed a typo (RAID6 vs RAID10) in FAQ (Closes: #637068)

---

 debian/FAQ       |    2 +-
 debian/changelog |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/FAQ b/debian/FAQ
index 189f0e7..6ec1c11 100644
--- a/debian/FAQ
+++ b/debian/FAQ
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ The latest version of this FAQ is available here:
   In two thirds of the cases, yes[0], and it does not matter which layout you
   use. When you assemble 4 disks into a RAID10, you essentially stripe a RAID0
   across two RAID1, so the four disks A,B,C,D become two pairs: A,B and C,D.
-  If A fails, the RAID6 can only survive if the second failing disk is either
+  If A fails, the RAID10 can only survive if the second failing disk is either
   C or D; If B fails, your array is dead.
 
   Thus, if you see a disk failing, replace it as soon as possible!
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 73e8440..91a9332 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ mdadm (3.2.3-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
     Closes: #641886, #628667, #645563, #651880, #607375
   * update Neil's email (Closes: #650630)
   * update mdadd.sh to version 1.52 (Closes: #655212)
+  * fixed a typo (RAID6 vs RAID10) in FAQ (Closes: #637068)
   * declare ordering dependency for multipath-tools-boot in
     mdadm-raid init script (Closes: #641584)
     While at it, remove mention of devfsd