About the Calendar Extension...

Mike Hommey mh at glandium.org
Sat Apr 7 16:30:01 UTC 2007

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:29:43AM -0400, Matthew K Poer <matthewpoer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why is Mozilla not releasing the calendar in their builds, if they are
> releasing the source for it? Are they not compiling their build from the
> same source?

The mozilla.org sources are cluttered. For example, the sources for
firefox contain chrome from thunderbird, ldap module, etc. The fact that
the calendar directory is in the seamonkey tarball doesn't say anything
about seamonkey having a calendar. It actually got removed from
seamonkey 1.1 tarballs. The only reason why iceape calendar has been
built is to give an upgrade path for people having mozilla-calendar
installed. Otherwise, I would not have activated it, actually.


More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers mailing list