About the Calendar Extension...

Matthew K Poer matthewpoer at gmail.com
Sun Apr 8 02:40:16 UTC 2007

Hash: SHA1

Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:29:43AM -0400, Matthew K Poer <matthewpoer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why is Mozilla not releasing the calendar in their builds, if they are
>> releasing the source for it? Are they not compiling their build from the
>> same source?
> (...)
> The mozilla.org sources are cluttered. For example, the sources for
> firefox contain chrome from thunderbird, ldap module, etc. The fact that
> the calendar directory is in the seamonkey tarball doesn't say anything
> about seamonkey having a calendar. It actually got removed from
> seamonkey 1.1 tarballs. The only reason why iceape calendar has been
> built is to give an upgrade path for people having mozilla-calendar
> installed. Otherwise, I would not have activated it, actually.
> Mike
I understand. iceape-calendar is really old, anyway, isn't it? What
would it take to get a newer one (specifically Chu's version), into Debian?

I notice Iceape is also missing an enigmail extension, and the official
MozDev builds seem to segfault on me every time.

Perhaps I can help with one of the two... I don't see any information
online about anyone debian-izing either of these two right now, would I
be the first to do so (if I were successful)?

- --
Please do not use HTML mail for fully-textual messages.
Matthew K Poer <matthewpoer at gmail.com>
Location: GA, USA              Web: http://matthewpoer.freehostia.com
GnuPG Public Key: 4DD0A9A6     Keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net
Thinkpad 600: Debian Sarge     Sony VAIO PCV-RS 520: Debian Etch
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with MultiZilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers mailing list