Bug#588944: marked as done (python-xpcom: xpcom.so failed to be built for python2.5)

Wed Jul 14 08:42:04 UTC 2010

Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:40:55 +0200
with message-id <20100714084055.GA3855 at glandium.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#588944: python-xpcom: xpcom.so failed to be built for python2.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #588944,
regarding python-xpcom: xpcom.so failed to be built for python2.5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
588944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <luke.leighton at gmail.com>
Subject: python-xpcom: xpcom.so failed to be built for python2.5
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:25:01 +0000
Size: 4477
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20100714/4855eeb9/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#588944: python-xpcom: xpcom.so failed to be built for
 python2.5
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:40:55 +0200
Size: 3126
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20100714/4855eeb9/attachment-0001.eml>