Icedove 3.1 replaced by 10.0.12-1~bpo60+1, l10n missing

[Christoph Goehre]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:49:54AM +0100, Stefan Baur wrote:
> Is there a particular reason why the main package was uploaded
> before the l10n packages were available?  Urgent security fix?  Or
> simply human error?

Mike, the maintainer of Iceweasel build the Icedove backport (which I
was very thankful about) and I didn't find the time to build the
icedove-l10n backport. That's it.

Cheers,
Christoph