Bug#768053: marked as done (xulrunner should depend on libjpeg62-turbo, not libjpeg anymore)

Tue Nov 4 23:00:05 UTC 2014

Your message dated Wed, 5 Nov 2014 07:56:38 +0900
with message-id <20141104225638.GA18176 at glandium.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#768053: xulrunner should depend on libjpeg62-turbo, not libjpeg anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #768053,
regarding xulrunner should depend on libjpeg62-turbo, not libjpeg anymore
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
768053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Joerg Dorchain <joerg at dorchain.net>
Subject: xulrunner should depend on libjpeg62-turbo, not libjpeg anymore
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:59:59 +0100
Size: 4037
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20141104/bb29eedc/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#768053: xulrunner should depend on libjpeg62-turbo, not libjpeg anymore
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 07:56:38 +0900
Size: 2266
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20141104/bb29eedc/attachment-0001.mht>