Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for
ntpdate in /etc/init.d
Rick Thomas
rbthomas55 at pobox.com
Sun Sep 24 06:35:12 UTC 2006
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 22. September 2006 04:25 schrieb Rick Thomas:
>>> But that information is not available in the if-up script.
>>
>> There are ways to find it out. If you like, I'll do up and test a
>> sample.
>
> Please.
Will do. I hope to get back to you in a couple of days(*).
>
>>>> If so, would it be desirable to have them officially conflict?
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> Forgive me my ignorance. I'm not an expert on the details of the apt
>> dependency process. Can you educate me as to why it's not a good
>> idea?
>
> Well, they don't actually conflict. They are just usually not used
> together.
> In particular, considering that in sarge, they usually *are* used
> together,
> it would probably upset quite a few people if we turned this around
> during
> the upgrade.
>
> If may make sense to drop the -u option from the default ntpdate
> options, so
> ntpdate doesn't run when ntpd is running. Do you want to try that
> out?
> (see /etc/default/ntpdate)
Happy to. Once again, give me a day or so to experiment.
(*) The main server for our house fried a disk this morning. I'm
still dealing with the details that remain after getting it back in
working order with a new disk. So it may take me a bit of time to
get to do the experiments. But I *will* do it.
I noticed that the new ntp/ntpdate packages made it into etch
yesterday. That will make the experiments a bit easier. I don't
normally run sid systems, which is why looking at the ntp* packages
in sid didn't occur to me first think.
Enjoy!
Rick
More information about the pkg-ntp-maintainers
mailing list