[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#302870: marked as done (octave-epstk: FTBFS: Can't satisfy build dependencies in sarge.)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:18:12 -0700


Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:07:50 -0700
with message-id <20050415120745.GC14112@mauritius.dodds.net>
and subject line octave-epstk: FTBFS: Can't satisfy build dependencies in sarge.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 14:21:04 +0000
>From kurt@roeckx.be Sun Apr 03 07:21:04 2005
Return-path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DI5yJ-0002zy-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:21:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 15E9622411F
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun,  3 Apr 2005 16:21:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
	by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1E9224053
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun,  3 Apr 2005 16:21:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id D214026136; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:21:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:21:02 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: octave-epstk: FTBFS: Can't satisfy build dependencies in sarge.
Message-ID: <20050403142102.GA14197@roeckx.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: octave-epstk
Version: 2.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

Hi,

Your package currently can't be build in sarge because it has a
build dependency on octave2.1-headers (>= 2.1.65).  Once such a
version reaches testing this bug can be closed.


Kurt


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302870-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2005 12:07:51 +0000
>From vorlon@debian.org Fri Apr 15 05:07:51 2005
Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DMPbz-0004J2-00; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:07:51 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F0D93171D59; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:07:50 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
To: 302870-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: octave-epstk: FTBFS: Can't satisfy build dependencies in sarge.
Message-ID: <20050415120745.GC14112@mauritius.dodds.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 302870-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The new version of octave2.1 is built on all archs and set to go into
testing tonight, so I believe this bug can now be closed.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCX66RKN6ufymYLloRAhPMAJ9Gg4CMRcsd7niRw/4q08Qo109xDwCgkrEa
9aLbx1UpaJA0Kr3WnLJiVko=
=8dlW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C--