[Pkg-octave-devel] Proposal: RFU
Rafael Laboissiere
rafael at debian.org
Thu Jul 19 19:01:26 UTC 2007
* Cyril Brulebois <cyril.brulebois at enst-bretagne.fr> [2007-07-19 16:40]:
> > Therefore, I propose to change the DOG Guidelines according to the
> > patch attached below (note that I removed all references to Emacs in
> > this patch). Comments are welcome.
>
> Mine are: excellent. :)
Okay, I went ahead and committed the changes. I think that nobody would
really disagree with the changes.
I also committed a paragraph about the new RFU rules (diffs attached below).
Please, check the DOG-Guidelines document now in SVN. After that, I will
update the DOG web site.
--
Rafael
-------------- next part --------------
Index: DOG-Guidelines.txt
===================================================================
--- DOG-Guidelines.txt (revision 981)
+++ DOG-Guidelines.txt (working copy)
@@ -55,6 +55,12 @@
XS-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-octave/<source-package>/
XS-Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-octave/<source-package>/
+Once a developer thinks that a given package in the SVN repository is ready
+for upload, a message should be dropped in the pkg-octave-devel mailing
+list containing a request for upload (RFU) and using the format "[RFU]
+<package> <version>" in the Subject line. If there are no objections
+during the following two work days, at least, the upload can be done by one
+of the official Debian developers of the DOG.
3. SVN repository
-----------------
More information about the Pkg-octave-devel
mailing list