[Pkg-octave-devel] Choosing a sensible name for a new package split from octave3.0

[Rafael Laboissiere]

* Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2008-09-15 11:02]:

> Thanks for your replies.  I think we are leaning towards octave3.0-common.
> This was also the suggestion of Thomas Weber in a thread in
> pkg-octave-devel.  Otherwise, octave3.0-scripts would be a good name if the
> package contained only scripts, but this is not going to be the case.

I started to work on this.  The changes should be committed soon.
 
-- 
Rafael