[Pkg-octave-devel] Choosing a sensible name for a new package split from octave3.0

Rafael Laboissiere rafael at debian.org
Fri Sep 19 11:28:20 UTC 2008

* Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2008-09-15 11:25]:

> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2008-09-15 11:02]:
> > Thanks for your replies.  I think we are leaning towards octave3.0-common.
> > This was also the suggestion of Thomas Weber in a thread in
> > pkg-octave-devel.  Otherwise, octave3.0-scripts would be a good name if the
> > package contained only scripts, but this is not going to be the case.
> I started to work on this.  The changes should be committed soon.

It took a while because I have been over swamped these last days.  It should
be committed today or tomorrow.


More information about the Pkg-octave-devel mailing list