[Pkg-octave-devel] [RFU] octave3.0 3.0.2-4 [was: Re: Choosing a sensible name ...]

[Rafael Laboissiere]

* Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2008-09-19 13:28]:

> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2008-09-15 11:25]:
> 
> > * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2008-09-15 11:02]:
> > 
> > > Thanks for your replies.  I think we are leaning towards octave3.0-common.
> > > This was also the suggestion of Thomas Weber in a thread in
> > > pkg-octave-devel.  Otherwise, octave3.0-scripts would be a good name if the
> > > package contained only scripts, but this is not going to be the case.
> > 
> > I started to work on this.  The changes should be committed soon.
> 
> It took a while because I have been over swamped these last days.  It should
> be committed today or tomorrow.

Done.  The package is lintian (1.24.4) clean, or warnings are overriden,
besides this one:

W: octave3.0-emacsen: command-with-path-in-maintainer-script postinst:27 /usr/bin/octave-tags-

which is actually a false positive (see Bug #495176).

Should I upload the new package to experimental?  It will go through the NEW
queue, of course.
 
-- 
Rafael