[php-maint] up-to-date policy for PHP PEAR modules
reg at evolix.fr
Sat Sep 22 01:28:41 UTC 2007
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:39:54AM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote:
> To conclude my opinion is:
> - We need register/unregister infos for debian-packaged pear
> modules (and then dh-make-php needs a patch). But we need
> probably separate debian-packaged and local-installed pear
> modules (see my previous answer to Sean).
> - I don't care if we use postinst/postrm or we keep
> .registry/PEARLIBRARYNAME.reg in binary package but I think we
> need make a choice to have a coherence for all pear packages.
> And keeping .registry/PEARLIBRARYNAME.reg file seems to be
> "standard de facto"...
I add that: with recent discussions on this thread about two
directories for pear modules, keeping
.registry/PEARLIBRARYNAME.reg in binary package (instead of using
postinst/postrm) becomes very recommended IMHO.
Gregory Colpart <reg at evolix.fr> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E
Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/
More information about the pkg-php-maint