[php-maint] up-to-date policy for PHP PEAR modules

Gregory Colpart reg at evolix.fr
Sat Sep 22 01:28:41 UTC 2007

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:39:54AM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote:
> To conclude my opinion is:
> - We need register/unregister infos for debian-packaged pear
>   modules (and then dh-make-php needs a patch). But we need
>   probably separate debian-packaged and local-installed pear
>   modules (see my previous answer to Sean).
> - I don't care if we use postinst/postrm or we keep
>   .registry/PEARLIBRARYNAME.reg in binary package but I think we
>   need make a choice to have a coherence for all pear packages.
>   And keeping .registry/PEARLIBRARYNAME.reg file seems to be
>   "standard de facto"...

I add that: with recent discussions on this thread about two
directories for pear modules, keeping
.registry/PEARLIBRARYNAME.reg in binary package (instead of using
postinst/postrm) becomes very recommended IMHO.

Gregory Colpart <reg at evolix.fr>  GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E
Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/

More information about the pkg-php-maint mailing list