[Pkg-postgresql-private] virtual packages for Sarge?

Martin Pitt mpitt@debian.org
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:00:08 +0100


--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Oliver!

Oliver Elphick [2004-11-02 10:19 +0000]:
> I get moments here and there when I have time to do things! and I picked
> it up again last week.  I realised that the main packaging problem I
> face is how to arrange the libraries and development packages.

Indeed this structure is clean and makes sense, and AFAICS it does not
require any particular provisions for the Sarge package.

However, I would prefer to let versions 7.2 and 7.3 die. It is
questionable whether they are supported upstream for the probably long
time that Etch will be developed and supported, and this new
architecture is nothing for Sarge anyway. For Etch we can assume that
we upgrade from Sarge, and so we should continue to support 7.4 (and
provide a seamless upgrade to it), and only add version 8.0.

This will also get us rid of many obsolete dependencies (libpq2,
kerberos-heimdal and so on).

Martin

--=20
Martin Pitt                       http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer            http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer       http://www.debian.org

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBh2i4DecnbV4Fd/IRAvELAJ4hQwJBDxeODK7/bVP2whV1pF+MewCaAqCX
4gDd86BVoJ1s33xVdC1L7NA=
=aTCH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--