[Pkg-postgresql-private] virtual packages for Sarge?
Oliver Elphick
olly@lfix.co.uk
Tue, 02 Nov 2004 11:17:43 +0000
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 12:00 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> However, I would prefer to let versions 7.2 and 7.3 die. It is
> questionable whether they are supported upstream for the probably long
> time that Etch will be developed and supported, and this new
> architecture is nothing for Sarge anyway. For Etch we can assume that
> we upgrade from Sarge, and so we should continue to support 7.4 (and
> provide a seamless upgrade to it), and only add version 8.0.
>
> This will also get us rid of many obsolete dependencies (libpq2,
> kerberos-heimdal and so on).
I certainly wouldn't propose to spend a lot of effort on them; however,
if I get it into experimental soon, there will still be people on 7.2
from woody, who could use it to avoid having to do a dump restore during
package upgrade, which we know to be a major source of problems. (If I
had known that sarge was going to be delayed so long, I would have got
on with this back in February.)
Similarly, there are some people who are still on 7.3.
I suppose that upstream will stop supporting 7.2 once 8.0 is out, but we
had a bugfix release on 7.2 only last month, so I wouldn't regard it as
dead yet.
The fact that the -dev packages are only from the latest release should
protect us against new database-using packages relying on an old
version. As for the dependencies, I think that they will go away
because I would use current unstable for building the packages. So
postgresql7.2 would use MIT kerberos rather than Heimdal.
--
Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E 1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA
========================================
"Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer;
behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison,
that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation
ten days; be thou faithful unto death, and I will give
thee a crown of life." Revelation 2:10