upload? (with summary of UNRELEASED stuff)

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:50:48PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> 2. deb822.py is licenced gplv2, but we have gplv3 modules using it

> for 2: I'm currently not entirely sure if this is really a problem. In
> order to avoid confusion and discussion of ftp-masters, can deb822.py be
> relicensed as gplv3 or later, and be done with it?

Actually it would be enough to relicense under "gpl v2 or above", but I
would prefer v3 as well.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-python-debian-discuss/attachments/20070721/8f9e3aec/attachment.pgp