[Pkg-running-devel] antpm not built on amd64

Christian PERRIER bubulle at debian.org
Tue Apr 1 04:33:10 UTC 2014

Quoting Philipp Kern (pkern at debian.org):
> Hi kristof,
> On 2014-03-27 10:04, kristof.ralovich at gmail.com wrote:
> >according to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=antpm [1]
> >our package antpm was not built or the amd64 architecture: "No entry
> >in amd64 database, check Packages-arch-specific".
> > - Could you please explain to me what this means?
> >- Why is it not build for amd64?
> >- How may we fix it?
> this is not a P-a-s problem. The problem is this:
> merge-v3 2014 Mar 31 13:21:57 antpm_1.16-1 (sparc, sid): skipped because
> binaries (assumed to be) overwritten (garmin-ant-downloader, 1.16-1 vs.
> 0:20110626-1)

Oh, doh, thanks Phil for the analysis.

I actually forgot, when uploading, about this *prospective* plan to
replace the g-a-d source package.

As we're not sure that this is ready yet, we should probably *not*
build a g-a-d binary package now, at least not until it is tested
enough (something *I* should do as I'm the one with the right

We should indeed upload another version of antpm, that does *not*
build a g-a-d binary package but preferrably start by providing the
ga-ad binary (with another name) as part of the general antpm binary

Kristof, can you prepare that?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-running-devel/attachments/20140401/a9969553/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-running-devel mailing list