[Pkg-running-devel] antpm not built on amd64

[kristof.ralovich at gmail.com]

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Christian PERRIER <bubulle at debian.org>wrote:

> Quoting Philipp Kern (pkern at debian.org):
> > Hi kristof,
> >
> > On 2014-03-27 10:04, kristof.ralovich at gmail.com wrote:
> > >according to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=antpm [1]
> > >our package antpm was not built or the amd64 architecture: "No entry
> > >in amd64 database, check Packages-arch-specific".
> > > - Could you please explain to me what this means?
> > >- Why is it not build for amd64?
> > >- How may we fix it?
> >
> > this is not a P-a-s problem. The problem is this:
> >
> > merge-v3 2014 Mar 31 13:21:57 antpm_1.16-1 (sparc, sid): skipped because
> > binaries (assumed to be) overwritten (garmin-ant-downloader, 1.16-1 vs.
> > 0:20110626-1)
>
> Oh, doh, thanks Phil for the analysis.
>
> I actually forgot, when uploading, about this *prospective* plan to
> replace the g-a-d source package.
>
> As we're not sure that this is ready yet, we should probably *not*
> build a g-a-d binary package now, at least not until it is tested
> enough (something *I* should do as I'm the one with the right
> device....).
>
> We should indeed upload another version of antpm, that does *not*
> build a g-a-d binary package but preferrably start by providing the
> ga-ad binary (with another name) as part of the general antpm binary
> package.
>
> Kristof, can you prepare that?
>
>
Dear Christian,

i've prepared something. Unfortunately my debian/unstable virtual machine
is corrupted and was not able to test is there. Could you check and upload
it if possible?

Also, please tag the version in git you used to upload the original 1.16-1.

Thanks,
Kristof
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-running-devel/attachments/20140406/3c032425/attachment.html>