[Pkg-scicomp-devel] anyone packaging Framewave?

[Christophe Prud'homme]

here is what I got with the latest version of scons (0.98.1) and
framewave (17/04) when I run svn-buildpackage

it fails very early in the build

rm -f debian/cdbs-install-list debian/cdbs-package-list
cd Framewave && python2.5 /usr/bin/scons --clean
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/scons", line 161, in <module>
    import SCons.Script
  File "/usr/lib/scons/SCons/Script/__init__.py", line 80, in <module>
    import SCons.Options
ImportError: Bad magic number in /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/__init__.pyc
make: *** [clean] Error 1


On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Albert Huang <albert at csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>  Have you had a chance to look at this package yet?
>
>  -albert
>
>
>
>  On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
>  <prudhomm at debian.org> wrote:
>  > Albert
>  >
>  >
>  >  On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Albert Huang
>  >  <ashuang at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>  >  > Ok, this is fixed upstream now but not yet formally released.  I've
>  >  >  modified the package to build from framewave subversion, similar to
>  >  >  how ffmpeg is packaged.
>  >  Ok
>  >  I am going to test it
>  >
>  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  One question I'm not sure about is whether to keep framewave as two
>  >  >  binary packages (libfwbase1, libfwbase1-dev) or eight -- two for each
>  >  >  library (libfwbase1, libfwimage1, libfwvideo, etc).  For now I've
>  >  >  packaged them all together as libfwbase1, libfwbase1-dev because I
>  >  >  don't think many people will have much use for them as separate
>  >  >  packages.
>  >  I agree with you
>  >
>  >  C.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Pkg-scicomp-devel mailing list
>  Pkg-scicomp-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-scicomp-devel
>