[Pkg-scicomp-devel] anyone packaging Framewave?

[Albert Huang]

I think this error is independent of framewave and our packaging.  A
new upstream release of SCons (0.98.1) was uploaded to unstable
yesterday, and apparently doesn't work at all.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476976

-albert

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
<prudhomm at debian.org> wrote:
> here is what I got with the latest version of scons (0.98.1) and
>  framewave (17/04) when I run svn-buildpackage
>
>  it fails very early in the build
>
>  rm -f debian/cdbs-install-list debian/cdbs-package-list
>  cd Framewave && python2.5 /usr/bin/scons --clean
>  Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/scons", line 161, in <module>
>     import SCons.Script
>   File "/usr/lib/scons/SCons/Script/__init__.py", line 80, in <module>
>     import SCons.Options
>  ImportError: Bad magic number in /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/__init__.pyc
>  make: *** [clean] Error 1
>
>
>
>
>  On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Albert Huang <albert at csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>  > Hi Christophe,
>  >
>  >  Have you had a chance to look at this package yet?
>  >
>  >  -albert
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
>  >  <prudhomm at debian.org> wrote:
>  >  > Albert
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Albert Huang
>  >  >  <ashuang at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>  >  >  > Ok, this is fixed upstream now but not yet formally released.  I've
>  >  >  >  modified the package to build from framewave subversion, similar to
>  >  >  >  how ffmpeg is packaged.
>  >  >  Ok
>  >  >  I am going to test it
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  One question I'm not sure about is whether to keep framewave as two
>  >  >  >  binary packages (libfwbase1, libfwbase1-dev) or eight -- two for each
>  >  >  >  library (libfwbase1, libfwimage1, libfwvideo, etc).  For now I've
>  >  >  >  packaged them all together as libfwbase1, libfwbase1-dev because I
>  >  >  >  don't think many people will have much use for them as separate
>  >  >  >  packages.
>  >  >  I agree with you
>  >  >
>  >  >  C.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
>  >  Pkg-scicomp-devel mailing list
>  >  Pkg-scicomp-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>  >  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-scicomp-devel
>  >
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Pkg-scicomp-devel mailing list
>  Pkg-scicomp-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-scicomp-devel
>