[Pkg-scicomp-devel] petsc3.1 using lam instead of openmpi ? incompatilbity with boost::mpi...

[Adam C Powell IV]

On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 08:31 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
> 
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:35 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> > I managed to recompile life without slepc but I also use boost mpi
> > compiled (build-depending on) with mpi-default-dev (as well as life)
> > and combining code linked with lam and openmpi generates a nice
> >  segfault
> > 
> > is there a place explaining the situation and how to fix my software ?
> > I read the discussions on mpi and the move to mpich2 and openmpi
> > but did not find guidelines
> 
> I'll fix and re-upload now.  But the file $PETSCDIR/conf/base is no
> longer part of PETSc as of 3.1, so change "base" to "variables" in the
> reverse-depends and you should get what you need.

On second thought, I'll put a compatibility link from base to variables
to make reverse-depends just work.

Apologies again for the LAM issue!

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-scicomp-devel/attachments/20100527/03fde8e8/attachment.pgp>