[Pkg-silc-devel] Updating SILC Toolkit to 1.1 beta 4
stesie at brokenpipe.de
stesie at brokenpipe.de
Sun May 27 15:56:52 UTC 2007
Hello,
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:11:06PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 10:26:32AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > If anyone else would like to make other adjustments, double-checking,
> > dependency building, etc., just do it now. :)
>
> I did found more time to work a bit more on the package.
>
> It now builds quite nicely, without any lintian warnings. The .diff.gz
> seems pretty clean to me, and debdiff did not show any regression in
> terms of files shipped.
in debian/rules we used to configure with
--with-simdir=\$${libdir}/silc/${name}
and
--includedir=\$${prefix}/include/silc/${name}
however ${name} wasn't initialized. You dropped the ${name} today.
Therefore the crypto modules are installed to /usr/lib/silc, not
/usr/lib/silc/libsilc-1.1-1 as it probably was (long) before. At least
that's the impression I get from the debian/rules file.
I wonder whether we should reenable this behaviour again, to be able to
install different libsilc versions (not -dev) in parallel.
Currently we're not able to, since these files would conflict; therefore
the somewhat uncommon conflict-entry in the control file for the library
itself (usually it's just for the -dev package, which conflicts because
of the *.so and maybe *.la files).
What about initializing name like this:
,--
| name=$(shell awk '/Package/ && !/dev/ { print $2 }' control)
`--
and modifying the pkg-config files accordingly?
cheers,
stesie
--
Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics;
I can assure you that mine are still greater.
-- Albert Einstein
More information about the Pkg-silc-devel
mailing list