[Pkg-sql-ledger-discussion] problems with 1.2.25 templates directory

Antoine Beaupré anarcat at debian.org
Thu Jan 12 14:25:40 UTC 2012


On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:32:46 -0500, Robert James Clay <jame at rocasa.us> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:03 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > It seems there's a change in the way 1.2.25 handles the templates
> > directory that breaks our install here. I used the debian/ directory
> > from the 1.2.25-1 tag to build myself a debian package, which I
> > installed. It proposed that i change the templates directory in my
> > config to /etc/ledgersmb/templates, but that doesn't actually work. It
> > needs to stay at "templates".
> 
>    I'll check into that.  Which version were you upgrading from?  And was it a debian package you'd created or another type of install?

1.2.18, took the package from the "sourceforge" page, according to our
docs, I assume this means the upstream .deb.

https://wiki.koumbit.net/LedgerSmbUpgrade#A1.2.18_to_1.2.25

> > The workaround i found was to create a symlink from
> > /etc/ledgersmb/templates to /usr/share/ledgersmb, then things went back
> > to normal.
> 
>    So in your installation, there was only a templates directory
> at /usr/share/ledgersmb/templates?

No, the opposite: no templates dir in /usr/share/ledgersmb/templates,
and only one in /etc/ledgersmb/templates. I had the templates path set
to "templates" in my ledgersmb.conf, but then ledger would look in
/usr/share/ledgersmb/templates and fail to find it.

> > I understand this may not be a priority since we're trying to focus on
> > 1.3 here, but i wanted to document in case others found the same
> > problem.
> 
>    If it's an issue with the debian packaging, then either the
> pkg-sql-ledger-discussion mailing list or the ITP bug is certainly the
> right place to discuss it.

Ok. I was under the understanding that 1.2 would never be uploaded so I
didn't see the point too much.

> > Also, we're not quite ready yet to upgrade to 1.3. :)
> 
>    I'm sure there are a number of people that is true for...<g>

Well, if that's the case, should we just upload 1.2 to the archive and
provide an upgrade path?

It would really be nice to have ledgersmb in the archive instead of,
each of us, having to build the package from bits and pieces all over
the place...

Thanks,

A.
-- 
We have no friends but the mountains.
            			- Kurdish saying
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sql-ledger-discussion/attachments/20120112/6c902c15/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pkg-sql-ledger-discussion mailing list