Bug#338999: separate non-free package ?
Peter Samuelson
peter at p12n.org
Sun Nov 27 00:07:05 UTC 2005
[Jean-Marc Ranger]
> Everyone agrees that CC isn't free, and removing svnbook from main
> was the right thing to do. However, I'd personaly like to be able to
> install a local copy of svnbook, preferably as a Debian package. At
> least one other package's documentation (svn-buildpackage) currently
> incorrectly refers to it. Would it be worthwhile to package it in
> non-free ?
Yes, it would be worthwhile. I've been thinking about ITPing it, if I
can find enough time to maintain it properly. If anyone else wants to
beat me to it, you're welcome to.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-subversion-maintainers/attachments/20051126/87cfe13c/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-subversion-maintainers
mailing list