Bug#338999: separate non-free package ?

[Jean-Marc Ranger]

Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Yes, it would be worthwhile.  I've been thinking about ITPing it, if I
> can find enough time to maintain it properly.  If anyone else wants to
> beat me to it, you're welcome to.

No thanks :) I'm not DD and the only package that I maintain 
(adm8211-source) has been waiting for a sponsor for a little while.

I'd simply suggest:

reassign 338999 wnpp
retitle 338999 RFP: svnbook - subversion documentation
thanks

Jean-Marc