swig trouble

[Laszlo Boszormenyi]

On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 01:45 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Yeah, upstream just noticed neon 0.26.0 a few hours ago, so I don't
> know when they'll support it.  I can try patching it myself, but I'd
> rather have upstream do the work and then just steal it. (:  I'm
> assuming using neon26 will require source changes, as usual.
 Yes, it needs source changes as the neon API changed enough again.
I think this is about the time to forget neon 0.24.x support as 0.25.y
is end of development; but it may be wise to wait for 0.26.1 (about
two months time).

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-subversion-maintainers/attachments/20060312/59250c1f/attachment.pgp