[Pkg-symfony-maint] packaging php5-propel

[John Arevalo]

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Federico Gimenez Nieto
<fgimenez at coit.es> wrote:

> Sorry, i didn't look into this carefully. It seems that somehow you
> haven't committed the master branch. I don't find now the propel
> repository that i created and configured, it had set up the hooks to
> send commit mail messages to the commits mailing list, we could review
> there what has happened. Anyway i think that you should try to recreate
> the php5-propel repository following [1] (from a session at alioth) and
> clone it again from your localhost.

you're right, i had given a name different to 'master', so git
required checkout manually. I fixed it.
to build package:

git clone git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-symfony/php5-propel.git
cd php5-propel
dpkg-buildpackage

currently 'phing' command must be on PATH env in order to run
successfully propel-gen. this package will depend of phing.

>
> Yes, i knew that draft document. If you ask me, i feel 'doctrine' a
> better name than 'php5-doctrine', in my opinion php is a language as
> good as any other (well, with its particularities :)) and there is no
> need to warn the users saying the language in which the source code of
> the package is written (see for example the drupal6 package).

i'm agree with you, php is as good as anyother web programming
language. Drupal is a package for end users, they don't take care
about PL, but these packages are php-specific development.

> that reviewed my initial work on symfony advised me to change the name
> from php5-symfony1.4 to just symfony1.4, and i thought that it was a
> good idea. Anyway, there are no normative documents about this, so you
> can name the package as you think that it will be better for all.

OK, i like to use same naming convention as pkg-symfony subpackage. I
think we should define that names.



> Cheers,
> Federico
>

Regards

-- 
John Arévalo
GNU/Linux User #443701
http://counter.li.org/