Release criteria (Was Re: removing synfig from etch?)

[Fabian Fagerholm]

On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 01:46 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Yep, and file an appropriate bug. Since it is almost 2am, I will do
> those tomorrow.

Thanks. I now opened specific blocking bugs on synfig and synfigstudio,
so it's clear to people what is going on.

We could start thinking of release criteria and a series of tests that
need to succeed before we let synfig(studio) into testing again.

For synfig, we could easily formulate this as a set of specific runs
(command line options + input files) that must produce the correct
results.

For synfigstudio, it's more or less about defining a set of
"click-paths" that must produce the correct results. I have some vague
memory of seeing a tool for automating such things, but I can't seem to
find it now.

Thoughts?

-- 
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe at paniq.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-synfig-devel/attachments/20060605/ec14440b/attachment.pgp