[pkg-synfig-devel] synfig: FTBFS due to our name change preparations

[Paul Wise]

On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 11:05 +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 12:38 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > That is really annoying, does policy not allow alternatives in
> > build-depends?
> 
> I think this is a buildd (sbuild) limitation, not a policy requirement.

Hmm, ok.

> > I think that while waiting for an answer on 354069, we
> > should upload a synfig that doesn't FTBFS. Probably just using etl-dev
> > only for now is fine. We can easily switch it later.
> 
> I asked on debian-mentors. It would be best if we could settle both
> issues at once, uploading new versions of etl and synfig with the
> correct names. Let's wait a few days and see if we can get this solved
> permanently.

vorlon has replied just now, saying etl-dev is just fine. I've committed
fixes removing mention of libetl-dev, and I'll close the etl bug.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-synfig-devel/attachments/20060319/489eacd9/attachment.pgp