[pkg-synfig-devel] synfig: FTBFS due to our name change preparations

[Fabian Fagerholm]

On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 12:38 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> That is really annoying, does policy not allow alternatives in
> build-depends?

I think this is a buildd (sbuild) limitation, not a policy requirement.

> I think that while waiting for an answer on 354069, we
> should upload a synfig that doesn't FTBFS. Probably just using etl-dev
> only for now is fine. We can easily switch it later.

I asked on debian-mentors. It would be best if we could settle both
issues at once, uploading new versions of etl and synfig with the
correct names. Let's wait a few days and see if we can get this solved
permanently.

-- 
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe at paniq.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-synfig-devel/attachments/20060319/24972bea/attachment.pgp