[pkg-synfig-devel] making this list the maintainer?

[Paul Wise]

On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 15:50 +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:

> > +1 -- as a matter of fact, I had the same thought the other day, but
> > then forgot to follow up on it. :)

Done. Also switched the unreleased changelog entries to add spaces in
the maintainer names so that dch/debchange doesn't get confused.

> Could we remove the [pkg-synfig-devel] thing in the subject? List
> filtering should happen using the list headers, and the subject becomes
> a little cluttered as it is now (my opinion).

Done.

> Could we provide a "human-readable" name for our packaging team, and
> have it consistent both in the debian/control file and in the mailing
> list configuration? "Debian Synfig Maintainers" seems to be in line with
> some other teams -- though it doesn't matter to me what we call
> ourselves, as long as it's not too silly :)

Using "Debian Synfig Maintainers" in all the control files and in the
list name.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-synfig-devel/attachments/20060324/ad6019ee/attachment.pgp