RFS: vim-latexsuite

Stefano Zacchiroli zack at debian.org
Tue Apr 18 19:45:34 UTC 2006


On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Franz Pletz wrote:
> Upstream has this version numbering scheme. I don't know why, perhaps they
> will release a 1.0 someday? When converting to the <date> scheme wouldn't
> there be problems when they actually release a 1.0?

Sorry, I did not answer this. Yes, there would be problems if they will
decide to release 1.0, problems that can be solved using an epoch [1].

 From your commit is seem you agreed in changing the versioning scheme
though.

[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20060418/75ddc058/attachment.pgp


More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list