nocp/cp

Stefano Zacchiroli zack at debian.org
Mon Jun 5 06:19:00 UTC 2006


On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:24:49PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> Should I go ahead and revert the debian.vim changes and update the build
> accordingly?

Since no one else commented I would say so. Have you thought about how
to apply the patch only to vim-tiny?

> I also have a vim-variant.preinst ready to fix #369740.  I
> just need to find an upgrade process that exhibits the behavior and
> double-check the preinst fixes it.

Great.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20060605/81ea16d3/attachment.pgp


More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list