nocp/cp

[James Vega]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 08:19:00AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:24:49PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > Should I go ahead and revert the debian.vim changes and update the build
> > accordingly?
> 
> Since no one else commented I would say so. Have you thought about how
> to apply the patch only to vim-tiny?

I'm moving the patch from patches/virc.c.diff to
debian/tiny/vimrc.tiny.diff and only applying it when we build vim-tiny.
Should I also move /etc/vim/vimrc.tiny to the vim-tiny package?  I'm not
sure if there's an easy way to move conffiles between packages.  If we
were to keep it in vim-common, we could use the code snippets from
dpkg.org[0] to perform a rename while still maintaining any changes the
users may have made.

James
[0] - Google cached URL since dpkg.org has been down for a while
http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:m7lYc7okPZIJ:www.dpkg.org/ConffileHandling+site:dpkg.org+conffile&hl=en&lr=&strip=1
-- 
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan at jamessan.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20060605/80148870/attachment.pgp