[Pkg-virtualbox-devel] [RFR] templates://virtualbox-ose/{virtualbox-ose.templates}

[Justin B Rye]

Christian Perrier wrote:
> Your review should be sent as an answer to this mail.

Arguing with the boilerplate paragraph and nothing else.

>  Package: virtualbox
[...]
> + VirtualBox is a free x86 virtualization solution allowing to run a wide
> + range of x86 operating systems on a Linux system. This includes Windows,
>   Linux, FreeBSD, DOS, OpenBSD and others.

Dis-"allow"ed; also, lists don't need to weasel at both ends (it's
either "includes A, B and C" or "consists of A, B, C and others").
How about:

 VirtualBox is a free x86 virtualization solution allowing a wide range
 of x86 operating systems such as Windows, DOS, BSD or Linux to run on a
 Linux system.

I take files like _netbsd.h as evidence that there's no special
significance to the particular BSDs listed.  Anyone feel like
arguing for "GNU/Linux" instead of "Linux"?  Or for suggesting a
specific distro ("Windows, DOS, BSD or SUSE Linux")?
-- 
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package