Tue, 17 May 2005 22:28:17 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:46:46PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> * Corsac <firstname.lastname@example.org>, [2005-05-17 11:27 +0200]:
> > there was some bugs left in xfce4-terminal: my email address was wrong
> > in the copyright file, and i had not commited the changes in rules file
> > about the name of the binary.
> > Now, the binary keeps his name from the upstream source
> > (/usr/bin/Terminal) and I've linked /usr/bin/xfce4-terminal to it.
> > Same for the man pages.
> > i've also updated the changelog. Ema, could you check if everything is
> > all right and upload the new package to experimental ?
> I've checked your changes and there is nothing technically wrong with the=
> However, I am not sure that we should supply a file with such a common=20
> name as /usr/bin/Terminal. What's wrong with /usr/bin/xfce4-terminal?
I thought we'd already done this on IRC?
We should ship it as Terminal as well because upstream do.
oOoOo "When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done oOoOo
oOoOo anything at all." -- God, Godfellas, Futurama oOoOo
htag.pl 0.0.22 ::::::: http://www.earth.li/~huggie/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----