[Pkg-xfce-devel] xfce4-terminal

[Emanuele Rocca]

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li>, [2005-05-17 22:28 +0100]:
>  On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:46:46PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
>  > However, I am not sure that we should supply a file with such a common=
=20
>  > name as /usr/bin/Terminal. What's wrong with /usr/bin/xfce4-terminal?
> =20
>  I thought we'd already done this on IRC?

Yeah, I remember the discussion but I somehow managed to forget the=20
conclusion. :^)

>  We should ship it as Terminal as well because upstream do.

Mmmh, I am not 100% convinced.
It is not necessary to respect each and every upstream decision,=20
especially when there is the possibility to invade others' namespaces.

BTW: we could check if there are similar situations in Debian already
and then choose how to proceed.
(Not really sure if the 'already' in the above sentence is misplaced or
not). ;P

ciao,=09
	ema

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCimxkC6DuA+rxm2ARApT/AJ9iV1XDcXyYepxg2duBskk7aggKTwCeLOX5
5JrUPAwHi+FrjncXZya4Evs=
=gvop
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--