[Reportbug-maint] merging common stuff in python-debianbts?

Ben Finney ben+debian at benfinney.id.au
Sun Jun 15 04:36:01 UTC 2008


Ben Finney <ben at benfinney.id.au> writes:

> On 04-Jun-2008, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > My working plan at the moment is to move most of the reusable code
> > in reportbug into a separate package, tentatively named
> > 'dreportbug'
> 
> I'm planning to implement the 'reportbug' Python package

I'm most of the way along with a branch that has the following
purpose:

    Move all non-program modules into a Python package directory,
    'reportbuglib/', and ensure all imports still work.

Now, 'reportbuglib' may not be the best choice of name, but the name
should be relatively simple to change later if we decide to. It also
avoids the concerns raised earlier about a package named 'reportbug'
and a program of the same name.

This branch doesn't do anything about moving *programs* around; they
will still be testable in-place. Nor does it address the "use
distutils" or "use setuptools" ideas. It's intended to be a minimal
change, to meet the above limited goal.

I expect to have this branch ready to merge into trunk fairly soon.
Does anyone have any objection to me doing so?

-- 
 \       Eccles: "I just saw the Earth through the clouds!"  Lew: "Did |
  `\     it look round?"  Eccles: "Yes, but I don't think it saw me."  |
_o__)                          -- The Goon Show, _Wings Over Dagenham_ |
Ben Finney




More information about the Reportbug-maint mailing list