[Reportbug-maint] [reportbug] r538 - in /trunk: ./ debian/changelog reportbug.py
Sandro Tosi
matrixhasu at gmail.com
Sun Jun 15 10:45:11 UTC 2008
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:35, Ben Finney <ben+debian at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> "Sandro Tosi" <matrixhasu at gmail.com> writes:
> It's also rather dubious to say that fixing trailing whitespace is
> "rewriting history" in the changelog.
you didn't changed only the lines before signature, but even:
> reportbug (3.29.5) unstable; urgency=low
> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@
> .reportbugrc files with 'bugs.debian.org' as the smtphost, and noisily
> overrides any 'master.debian.org' settings it sees. (Closes: #338900)
> * s/kernel-image/linux-image/ (Closes: #336871)
> - * Generate a Message-ID for every message sent by reportbug.
> + * Generate a Message-ID for every message sent by reportbug.
> (Closes: #341325)
[8<]
> reportbug (2.10.2) unstable; urgency=low
> @@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@
> * Don't declare a character set on anything we send. This should
> resolve all of the following...
> (Closes: #165720, #166495, #166248, #166819)
> - (The right thing to do is figure out what character set is used, but
> + (The right thing to do is figure out what character set is used, but
> I'm not writing a full-blown MUA here...)
> * Rewrite to use MIMEMultipart instead of MIMEBase.
> (Closes: #165856, #167222)
[8<]
> reportbug (2.7) unstable; urgency=low
> @@ -1436,12 +1436,12 @@
>
> * The "I thought Python 2.2 was feature-frozen" release.
> * Back off on the email module's overaggressive quoting of ASCII
> - characters in headers. (Something like reportbug::encode_if_needed
> + characters in headers. (Something like reportbug::encode_if_needed
> probably should migrate into the email module for everyone's sanity.)
> * I should also back off on the overaggressive q-p encoding of message
> bodies, but we get a lhuvely DeprecationWarning if we do that...
> * Did I mention I thought Python 2.2 was feature-frozen?
[8<]
> reportbug (0.43) unstable; urgency=low
>
> - * Back out change in 0.42 that broke reportbug if you didn't have a
> + * Back out change in 0.42 that broke reportbug if you didn't have a
> "real name". (Closes: #50378)
> * Don't try to get input in find_package_for() if we don't have a TTY.
> Instead, list matching package names. (Closes: #50622)
Again, for only the sake of an automatic change with not real advantage.
>> Please revert this changes.
>
> How would you propose we address trailing whitespace?
In the changelog? don't change the old entries, pay attention in the
current+future entries.
> If you'd prefer they not be fixed, can you say why?
What advantage their removal bring into the package? nothing, so don't
change thinks not broken, that's my policy.
> I automatically
> remove trailing whitespace in my editor, so fixing it once means that
> we avoid accidental noise in more substantial changesets.
Trailing whitespaces are so un-harmful that's doubtful worth fixing
(in the changelog it's not).
Sandro
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
More information about the Reportbug-maint
mailing list