[Reportbug-maint] Modularization work in progress
matrixhasu at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 19:05:13 UTC 2008
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 23:57, Sandro Tosi <matrixhasu at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 23:39, Chris Lawrence <lawrencc at debian.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Sandro Tosi <matrixhasu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Well, on which version to merge, I think you should reach a consensus
>>> with Chris.
>> Probably the easiest way to go about this is to merge Ben's work
>> around the end of the week and release 3.42 based on that. We can
>> then decide whether proper modularization (the python-reportbug
>> package, based on my work) is appropriate for lenny or if we should
>> wait for the next testing cycle. My gut feeling is that we can
>> probably get python-reportbug into lenny without any issues and I
>> think that would be better in the long run.
> well, so why wait? I think if that's the way to go, then Ben can merge
> asap (I got no commit pending on my side), so we can work on that
> version, then Chris you have more time to work on your tree to be
> merged after 3.42.
mh, I just gave a look to Ben's "branch": do we really need an
additional level (reportbuglib) into /usr/share/reportbug/ ?
I don't know how Chris' tree looks like, but having (-> means installed into)
<svn trunk>/bin/reportbug -> /usr/bin/reportbug
<svn trunk>/reportbug/<files>.py -> /usr/share/reportbug/
so that we can import reportbug (the trick can be adding /usr/share to
sys.path and leaving reportbug/ in it, as of now, I think) it seems to
me a "cleaner" solution.
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
More information about the Reportbug-maint